The MITO-END3 trial compared carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) with avelumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (CPA) as first-line treatment in endometrial cancer (EC) patients and demonstrated a significant interaction between avelumab response and mismatch repair status. To investigate prognostic/predictive biomarker, 29 MITO-END3-EC patients were evaluated at pretreatment (B1) and at the end of CP/CPA treatment (B2) for peripheral myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and Tregs. At B2, effector Tregs frequency was significantly higher in patients treated with CPA as compared to CP (p = 0.038). Both treatments (CP/CPA) induced significant decrease in peripheral M-MDSC (- 5.41%) in TCGA 2-MSI-high as compared to TCGA-category 4 tumors (p = 0.004). In accordance, both treatments induced M-MDSCs (+ 5.34%) in MSS patients as compared to MSI-high patients (p = 0.001). Moreover, in a subgroup of patients, primary tumors were highly infiltrated by M-MDSCs in MSS as compared to MSI-high ECs. A post hoc analysis displayed higher frequency of M-MDSCs (p = 0.020) and lower frequency of CD4+ (p < 0.005) at pretreatment in EC patients as compared to healthy donors. In conclusion, the peripheral evaluation of MDSCs and Tregs correlated with molecular features in EC treated with CP/CPA and may add insights in identifying EC patients responder to first-line chemo/chemo-immunotherapy.
© 2025. The Author(s).

Current chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR) T-cell products are evaluated in bulk, without assessing functional heterogeneity. We therefore generated a comprehensive single-cell gene expression and T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing data set using pre- and postinfusion CD19-CAR T cells from blood and bone marrow samples of pediatric patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We identified cytotoxic postinfusion cells with identical TCRs to a subset of preinfusion CAR T cells. These effector precursor cells exhibited a unique transcriptional profile compared with other preinfusion cells, corresponding to an unexpected surface phenotype (TIGIT+, CD62Llo, CD27-). Upon stimulation, these cells showed functional superiority and decreased expression of the exhaustion-associated transcription factor TOX. Collectively, these results demonstrate diverse effector potentials within preinfusion CAR T-cell products, which can be exploited for therapeutic applications. Furthermore, we provide an integrative experimental and analytic framework for elucidating the mechanisms underlying effector development in CAR T-cell products.
Utilizing clonal trajectories to define transcriptional potential, we find a unique signature of CAR T-cell effector precursors present in preinfusion cell products. Functional assessment of cells with this signature indicated early effector potential and resistance to exhaustion, consistent with postinfusion cellular patterns observed in patients. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2007.
©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

CD19-CAR T cell therapy has evolved into the standard of care for relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); however, limited persistence of the CAR T cells enables tumor relapse for many patients. To gain a deeper understanding of the molecular characteristics associated with CAR T cell differentiation, we performed longitudinal genome-wide DNA methylation profiling of CD8+ CD19-CAR T cells post-infusion in ALL patients. We report that CAR T cells undergo a rapid and broad erasure of repressive DNA methylation reprograms at effector-associated genes. The CAR T cell post-infusion changes are further characterized by repression of genes (e.g., TCF7 and LEF1) associated with memory potential and a DNA methylation signature (e.g., demethylation at CX3CR1, BATF, and TOX) demarcating a transition toward exhaustion-progenitor T cells. Thus, CD19-CAR T cells undergo exhaustion-associated DNA methylation programming, indicating that efforts to prevent this process may be an attractive approach to improve CAR T cell efficacy.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.