Flow cytometry analysis of microglia in SIRPα KO mice and WT aged mice.(A) Cells isolated from the spinal cord of control WT or SIRPα KO (KO) mice at 14 wks of age were incubated with a PE-conjugated monoclonal antibody (mAb) to SIRPα, a PerCP–Cy5.5-conjugated mAb to CD45, and an FITC-conjugated ...
more
Flow cytometry analysis of microglia in SIRPα KO mice and WT aged mice.(A) Cells isolated from the spinal cord of control WT or SIRPα KO (KO) mice at 14 wks of age were incubated with a PE-conjugated monoclonal antibody (mAb) to SIRPα, a PerCP–Cy5.5-conjugated mAb to CD45, and an FITC-conjugated mAb to CD11b. The expression of CD11b and CD45 on monocyte cells or of SIRPα on CD11b+/CD45dim/lo microglia was analysed by flow cytometry. The percentage of CD11b+/CD45dim/lo microglia among putative monocytes is indicated in each plot (left plots). The expression profiles for SIRPα on CD11b+/CD45dim/lo microglia are shown in the right panel. (B) Cells prepared as in panel (A) from WT or SIRPα KO mice at 14–21 wks of age were stained with antibodies to CD45, CD11b, and CD11c, and analysed by flow cytometry. The percentage of CD11b+/CD45dim/lo/CD11c+ microglia among total CD11b+/CD45dim/lo microglia is indicated in each plot. Quantitative data are shown in the right panel. Filled and open bars indicate WT and SIRPα KO mice, respectively. (C) Cells prepared from SIRPα KO mice were stained for CD45, CD11b and CD11c, as well as for CD14, Dectin-1, or CD68. Plots were gated on CD11b+/CD45dim/lo cells, and CD14, Dectin-1, or CD68 on CD11c–positive and -negative microglia were analysed. The expression profiles for each molecule in CD11b+/CD45dim/lo microglia are shown. (D) Cells isolated from adult (18 wks of age) or aged (104 wks of age) mice were isolated and analysed as in panel (A). (E) Cells prepared as in panel (D) from adult (16–18 wks of age) or aged (69–105 wks of age) mice were analysed as in (B). Quantitative data are shown in the right panel. Filled and open bars indicate adult and aged mice, respectively. (F) Cells prepared from aged mice were analysed as in panel (C).Data in panels (B) and (E) are the means ± SEM (n = 5 (B) and 3 (E) independent experiments). **p<0.01 (Welch’s t-test). Other data are representative of at least 3–5 independent experiments. Filled and open traces in panels (A), (C, F), and (D) indicate WT and SIRPα KO mice (A), CD11c– and CD11c+ cells (C, F), and adult and aged mice (D), respectively.Forward (FSC) and side (SSC) scatter distribution of CD11c+microglia.FSC/SSC distribution of WT (upper panels) and SIRPαKO (lower panels) microglia were analysed. CD11c+ and CD11c— microglia in the left panels (events in the solid and dotted rectangles, respectively) are presented on the FSC/SSC plots in the right panels. Scatter plots in the left panels are identical to those shown in Figure 3B. All data used in Figure 3B were analysed in the same way, and representative results are shown.Expression of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in the brain and spinal cord of SIRPα KO mice.Whole brains and spinal cords were dissected from WT or SIRPα KO mice at 13–20 wks of age for the isolation of total RNA. The expressions of the indicated cytokines were then determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. The amount of each mRNA was normalised to that of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA and is presented relative to the mean value for control WT mice. Filled and open bars indicate WT and SIRPα KO mice, respectively. Data are the means ± SEM (n = 6 mice for each genotype). *p<0.05 (Welch’s t-test).
less