Mutation of arginine 35 in C/EBPα accelerates B cell gene silencing and macrophage gene activation.(A) FACS plots of Mac-1 (CD11b) and CD19 expression in B cells induced with C/EBPαWT, C/EBPα, C/EBPαR12A, C/EBPαR35A, or C/EBPαR86A at different days post induction. (B) Histograms showing fluoresce...
more
Mutation of arginine 35 in C/EBPα accelerates B cell gene silencing and macrophage gene activation.(A) FACS plots of Mac-1 (CD11b) and CD19 expression in B cells induced with C/EBPαWT, C/EBPα, C/EBPαR12A, C/EBPαR35A, or C/EBPαR86A at different days post induction. (B) Histograms showing fluorescence intensity by flow cytometry of internalized BFP carboxylated beads in C/EBPαWT and C/EBPαR35A-induced B cells (dashed line) incubated overnight. Data for uninduced control B cells are represented by a continuous line. Percentage of phagocytic cells is indicated. (C) Immunofluorescent images of uninduced (day 0) and 5 days-induced B cells incubated overnight with BFP carboxylated beads. DNA was stained with picogreen (P7589) and F-actin with phalloidin Alexa Fluor 568. (D) Scatterplots showing gene expression changes at 1, 3, 6, 18, and 120 hpi relative to 0 hr for B cells induced with either C/EBPαWT or C/EBPαR35A. Red line = regression line fitted to each scatterplot; green line = identity line (x=y); ρ=Spearman correlation coefficient; n=number of differentially expressed genes. (F) Kinetics of gene expression of clusters I, II, and VII of B cells induced with either C/EBPαWT or C/EBPαR35A at different times post induction. The Y axis shows log2-fold changes relative to uninduced cells. The lines and the shaded backgrounds correspond to the mean ± 1.64 s.d., n=1103–1868. (G) RNA expression levels of key macrophage or B cell genes in B cells induced by either C/EBPαWT or C/EBPαR35A relative to 0 hr (mean ± s.d., n=2). (H) RNA expression levels of selected macrophage and B cell signature genes in B cells induced by either C/EBPαWT or C/EBPαR35A relative to 120 hr and 0 hr, respectively (median and quartiles are represented, n=20, statistical significance was determined using multiple paired Student’s t-test for individual timepoint comparisons as well as two-way ANOVA for overall statistical significance).
less