Triggering of the BCR by anti-IgM induces VLA-4 activation and increases cell adhesion and VLA-4 clustering in CLL cells also upon ibrutinib treatment in vitro. (A) Calcium response to anti-IgM stimulation in PBMCs from 30 CLL cases. The pseudocolored dot plot on the right shows an example of BCR...
more
Triggering of the BCR by anti-IgM induces VLA-4 activation and increases cell adhesion and VLA-4 clustering in CLL cells also upon ibrutinib treatment in vitro. (A) Calcium response to anti-IgM stimulation in PBMCs from 30 CLL cases. The pseudocolored dot plot on the right shows an example of BCR response time (in seconds) over Fluo-4 intensity in one representative CLL case. Addition of the stimulus is indicated by the arrow. (B and C) MFIs of phospho (p)-BTK (B) and p-ERK (C) in unstimulated and anti-IgM stimulated cells from 24 CLL cases. The histogram plot overlays below the graphs show p-BTK (B) and p-ERK (C) expression in the unstimulated and anti-IgM–stimulated cells from one representative CLL case; the light gray histograms correspond to unstained cells. (D) VLA-4 RO in primary CLL cells from 26 cases (all cases expressing >60% CD49d), pretreated or not with 1 µM ibrutinib and stimulated or not with 5 µg/ml anti-IgM. The reported VLA-4 RO values were calculated as described in Materials and methods and correspond to the presence of 10 nM LDV. (E) VLA-4 RO plotted versus LDV concentration using the sigmoidal dose–response equation with variable slope performed by GraphPad Prism software in cells untreated (left) or treated with ibrutinib (right) in one representative CLL case. The arrows indicate the shift from the control to the anti-IgM–stimulated condition at 10 nM LDV. EC50 values for all conditions are indicated. R2 corresponds to the coefficient of determination. (F) VLA-4 RO in primary CLL cells expressing CD49d between 10% and 29% (n = 5) and between 30% and 60% (n = 4), pretreated or not with 1 µM ibrutinib and stimulated or not with 5 µg/ml anti-IgM. (G) VLA-4 RO in T lymphocytes from 15 CLL cases in unstimulated and anti-IgM–stimulated conditions. The line graph on the right shows the VLA-4 RO plotted versus LDV concentration obtained in T-lymphocytes from one representative CLL case. (H) VLA-4 clusters in primary CLL cells from 3 cases treated as in (D) obtained on VCAM-1-coated slides. Quantitative clustering analysis was done in at least 50 individual cells for each condition by means of confocal microscopy (original magnification ×60). The three dot plots correspond to three different cases and show the cluster number for all analyzed cells in each condition. On the right, representative confocal microscopy images of VLA-4 clusters revealed by anti-CD49d mAbs, are shown. Bars, 2 µm. (I) Adhesion on VCAM-1 of primary CLL cells from 15 cases treated as in D. Cell adhesion was calculated as relative fold change obtained on VCAM-1 over BSA. Each experiment was run in triplicate. (J) Purified CLL cells from eight cases were stimulated or not with anti-IgM and perfused for 1 min at 0.5 dyn/cm2 over immobilized VCAM-1. The data are expressed as the mean of frequencies of cells in direct contact with the substrate (tethering). Each experiment was run in triplicate. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Individual symbols represent individual cases in all panels except H, which represents individual cells. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001; n.s., not significant (Wilcoxon test in all panels except F, where a paired t test was applied).
less