Product Citations: 30

Type III interferons suppress influenza A virus infection independently of STAT activation by triggering cell death

Preprint on BioRxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology on 13 September 2024 by Prus, W., Grabowski, F., et al.

Type III interferons (IFN-λ1–λ4) are known to limit influenza virus infections in vivo and are non-redundant to type I interferons (IFN-α and IFN-β). Here, we demonstrated in vitro that type III interferons limit infection with influenza A virus (IAV) independently of STAT1 and STAT2 activation. Despite the fact that the knockout of the IFN-λ receptor (subunit IFNLR1), compared to the knockout of the IFN-β receptor (subunit IFNAR1), is associated with higher levels of STAT1/2 phosphorylation during infection, it results in a greater proportion of IAV-infected cells and higher viral RNA and protein levels. We showed that the ratio of dying to infected cells is lower in IFNLR1-deficient cells compared to wild-type cells suggesting that type III interferons limit the spread of IAV by promoting the death of IAV-infected cells. In contrast, type I interferons induce a stronger accumulation of proteins coded by interferon-stimulated genes, and correspondingly suppress IAV spread more effectively than type III interferons when provided prior to infection. Overall, our results suggest an additional non-transcriptional role of type III interferons in the control of viral infections. Key points IFNAR1 deficiency leads to a significant reduction of STAT1/2 activation in cell populations infected with IAV and a small decrease in IAV proliferation. IFNLR1 deficiency leads to a small reduction of STAT1/2 activation in cell populations infected with IAV and a significant increase in IAV proliferation. IFN-λ controls the proliferation of IAV (but not RSV) independently of STAT1/2 signaling. IFN-λ signaling increases the ratio of the dead to the infected cells, likely by promoting death in IAV-infected cells.

  • Homo sapiens (Human)
  • Immunology and Microbiology

Ferroptosis susceptibility of melanoma cells: dependence on cell-type, acquired drug resistance, and medium composition

Preprint on BioRxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology on 12 August 2024 by Preis, J. R., Rolvering, C., et al.

Resistance of melanoma cells to targeted therapy (BRAF and MEK inhibitors) is a major clinical problem and alternative treatments are sought. We describe the establishment of modular physiologic medium (MPM) and Mel-MPM (which contains additional supplements and sustains the 3D growth of melanoma cells, fibroblasts (NHDFs) and HMEC-1 endothelial cells) as novel resources for melanoma and combine them with a multi-cell-type matrix-embedded 3D culture model to investigate melanoma cell vulnerabilities in a more physiological setting. We made use of the modular nature of MPM to interrogate NEAA dependencies in melanoma cells and we found them to be particularly sensitive to the depletion of C/C. We additionally describe that melanoma cells are less sensitive to ferroptosis inducing compounds when cultured in MPM compared to RPMI and we could attribute this to different components of MPM and Mel-MPM (selenite, B27). Cell death induced by the glutathione peroxidase 4 inhibitor, ML162, had characteristics of ferroptosis or apoptosis depending on cell type, its drug resistance status and the culture medium. Cystine/cysteine starvation and ML162 treatment combinations increased melanoma cell death in 2D, 3D, and also in the complex matrix embedded multi-cell-type-3D system in Organoplates TM . This underlines the potential of combining metabolism-oriented drug treatments with amino acid starvation conditions, which is of interest in view of future therapeutic approaches to combat melanoma and other cancer types.

  • WB
  • Cancer Research

Antagonism between viral infection and innate immunity at the single-cell level.

In PLoS Pathogens on 1 September 2023 by Grabowski, F., Kochańczyk, M., et al.

When infected with a virus, cells may secrete interferons (IFNs) that prompt nearby cells to prepare for upcoming infection. Reciprocally, viral proteins often interfere with IFN synthesis and IFN-induced signaling. We modeled the crosstalk between the propagating virus and the innate immune response using an agent-based stochastic approach. By analyzing immunofluorescence microscopy images we observed that the mutual antagonism between the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and infected A549 cells leads to dichotomous responses at the single-cell level and complex spatial patterns of cell signaling states. Our analysis indicates that RSV blocks innate responses at three levels: by inhibition of IRF3 activation, inhibition of IFN synthesis, and inhibition of STAT1/2 activation. In turn, proteins coded by IFN-stimulated (STAT1/2-activated) genes inhibit the synthesis of viral RNA and viral proteins. The striking consequence of these inhibitions is a lack of coincidence of viral proteins and IFN expression within single cells. The model enables investigation of the impact of immunostimulatory defective viral particles and signaling network perturbations that could potentially facilitate containment or clearance of the viral infection.
Copyright: © 2023 Grabowski et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

  • WB
  • Homo sapiens (Human)
  • Immunology and Microbiology

ADAR1 Biology Can Hinder Effective Antiviral RNA Interference.

In Journal of Virology on 27 April 2023 by Uhl, S., Jang, C., et al.

Viruses constantly evolve and adapt to the antiviral defenses of their hosts. The biology of viral circumvention of these selective pressures can often be attributed to the acquisition of novel antagonistic gene products or by rapid genome change that prevents host recognition. To study viral evasion of RNA interference (RNAi)-based defenses, we established a robust antiviral system in mammalian cells using recombinant Sendai virus designed to be targeted by endogenous host microRNAs (miRNAs) with perfect complementarity. Using this system, we previously demonstrated the intrinsic ability of positive-strand RNA viruses to escape this selective pressure via homologous recombination, which was not observed in negative-strand RNA viruses. Here, we show that given extensive time, escape of miRNA-targeted Sendai virus was enabled by host adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1). Independent of the viral transcript targeted, ADAR1 editing resulted in disruption of the miRNA-silencing motif, suggesting an intolerance for extensive RNA-RNA interactions necessary for antiviral RNAi. This was further supported in Nicotiana benthamiana, where exogenous expression of ADAR1 interfered with endogenous RNAi. Together, these results suggest that ADAR1 diminishes the effectiveness of RNAi and may explain why it is absent in species that utilize this antiviral defense system. IMPORTANCE All life at the cellular level has the capacity to induce an antiviral response. Here, we examine the result of imposing the antiviral response of one branch of life onto another and find evidence for conflict. To determine the consequences of eliciting an RNAi-like defense in mammals, we applied this pressure to a recombinant Sendai virus in cell culture. We find that ADAR1, a host gene involved in regulation of the mammalian response to virus, prevented RNAi-mediated silencing and subsequently allowed for viral replication. In addition, the expression of ADAR1 in Nicotiana benthamiana, which lacks ADARs and has an endogenous RNAi system, suppresses gene silencing. These data indicate that ADAR1 is disruptive to RNAi biology and provide insight into the evolutionary relationship between ADARs and antiviral defenses in eukaryotic life.

  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Microbiology

We observed the interference between two prevalent respiratory viruses, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza A virus (IAV) (H1N1), and characterized its molecular underpinnings in alveolar epithelial cells (A549). We found that RSV induces higher levels of interferon beta (IFN-β) production than IAV and that IFN-β priming confers higher-level protection against infection with IAV than with RSV. Consequently, we focused on the sequential infection scheme of RSV and then IAV. Using A549 wild-type (WT), IFNAR1 knockout (KO), IFNLR1 KO, and IFNAR1-IFNLR1 double-KO cell lines, we found that both IFN-β and IFN-λ are necessary for maximum protection against subsequent infection. Immunostaining revealed that preinfection with RSV partitions the cell population into a subpopulation susceptible to subsequent infection with IAV and an IAV-proof subpopulation. Strikingly, the susceptible cells turned out to be those already compromised and efficiently expressing RSV, whereas the bystander, interferon-primed cells are resistant to IAV infection. Thus, virus-virus exclusion at the cell population level is not realized through direct competition for a shared ecological niche (single cell) but rather is achieved with the involvement of specific cytokines induced by the host's innate immune response. IMPORTANCE Influenza A virus (IAV) and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) are common recurrent respiratory infectants that show a relatively high coincidence. We demonstrated that preinfection with RSV partitions the cell population into a subpopulation susceptible to subsequent infection with IAV and an IAV-proof subpopulation. The susceptible cells are those already compromised and efficiently expressing RSV, whereas the bystander cells are resistant to IAV infection. The cross-protective effect critically depends on IFN-β and IFN-λ signaling and thus ensues when the proportion of cells preinfected with RSV is relatively low yet sufficient to trigger a pervasive antiviral state in bystander cells. Our study suggests that mild, but not severe, respiratory infections may have a short-lasting protective role against more dangerous respiratory viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

  • WB
  • Influenza A virus (A/Taiwan/01/1986(H1N1))
  • Immunology and Microbiology
View this product on CiteAb