The p-Stat5 response in fetal liver.(A) Flow cytometric Ter119/CD71 profile of freshly isolated fetal liverat E13.5, fixed and permeabilized in preparation for intracellularp-Stat5 measurements. Subsets S0 to S4 (left histogram) containerythroblasts of increasing maturation, as seen from their mo...
more
The p-Stat5 response in fetal liver.(A) Flow cytometric Ter119/CD71 profile of freshly isolated fetal liverat E13.5, fixed and permeabilized in preparation for intracellularp-Stat5 measurements. Subsets S0 to S4 (left histogram) containerythroblasts of increasing maturation, as seen from their morphologicalappearance in cytospin preparations (stained with Giemsa anddiaminobenzidine). The right histogram shows the further division of S3cells into small and large subsets based on the flow-cytometric“forward scatter” parameter. (B) Specificity of the Alexa647-conjugated anti-p-Stat5 antibody (BD Biosciences # 612599). Upperpanels, response of S1 cells from either wild-type orStat5−/− fetal livers to Epo stimulation (2U/ml) for 15 min (red histograms). Blue histograms are baselinefluorescence in the absence of Epo. Lower panels, Epo-stimulated (2U/ml; 15 min, red histograms) or unstimulated (blue histograms) S1 cellsin wild-type fetal liver, either treated or untreated withλ-phosphatase prior to p-Stat5 staining. Numbers in all panelsindicate the fraction (%) of p-Stat5 positive cells within theindicated horizontal gates. (C) The three measures used to analyze thep-Stat5 response to Epo (9 U/ml, 15 min, red histogram) in S3erythroblasts. The black histogram corresponds to pre-stimulation cellsof the same subset. (i) “total p-Stat5 median fluorescenceintensity (MFI)” (upper panel), the p-Stat5 MFI ofthe entire S3-subset population, represented by the shaded redhistogram. This measure does not distinguish between signaling andnonsignaling cells. (ii) “p-Stat5+cells(%)” (lower panel), cells within thep-Stat5+ gate, shaded in red, expressed as afraction (percent) of all cells in the Epo-stimulated S3 subset. This isan estimate of the number of signaling cells. The placement of thep-Stat5+ gate was determined by reference to thebaseline, pre-stimulation histogram (in black), so that no more than1% of the unstimulated population is included within thep-Stat5+ gate. (iii) “p-Stat5 inp-Stat5+ cells” (lower panel),estimates the p-Stat5 MFI in signaling cells only. (D) Response of S1and S3 erythroblasts to Epo stimulation. Freshly isolated fetal livercells were deprived of Epo for 90 min and were then stimulated with arange of Epo concentrations as indicated, from 0.004 to 9 U/ml, for 15min. Colored flow-cytometry histograms correspond to Epo-stimulatedcells, black histograms in each panel correspond to unstimulated cells(Epo = 0). An overlay of the responses is shown inthe two lowest panels. For each Epo concentration, three measures of thep-Stat5 response, as illustrated in (C), are noted next to eachflow-cytometry histogram in blue, black, and green, corresponding to thetotal p-Stat5 MFI, to the p-Stat5+ cells (%), andto the p-Stat5 in p-Stat5+ cells, respectively. Each ofthese measures is then plotted as a function of Epo concentration (rightpanels); the color of each symbol in these plots corresponds to thecolor of the respective flow-cytometry histogram for the same Epoconcentration. (E) The p-Stat5 response to a range of Epo concentrationsat 15 min post-stimulation. Summary of five independent experimentssimilar to Panel D. Data (mean ± SE) for each experiment werenormalized by expressing each p-Stat5 MFI reading as a ratio to thep-Stat5 MFI in p-Stat5+ cells of the “S3large” subset following stimulation with 1 U/ml Epo for 15 min.Data in the upper two panels were fitted with Hill curves.
less